Our paper (first-authored by Britt McKinnon) sat at Maternal Child Health Journal for almost 6 months, and came back today as "revise and resubmit" with 6 reviews, but each one was only a few lines long.
For example, Reviewer 3 had only 3 lines of comments, which were numbered 1), 2) and 2). The second comment number 2 was:
"The use of word WE is repeated so many times. Please change it at least in a few places to enhance readability."
to which we intend to repond: "We agree."
But the best comment of all time goes to reviewer 5, who states (with no apparent irony or embarassment):
"The paper is very statistically oriented and would do well with a more ideological approach."
For example, Reviewer 3 had only 3 lines of comments, which were numbered 1), 2) and 2). The second comment number 2 was:
"The use of word WE is repeated so many times. Please change it at least in a few places to enhance readability."
to which we intend to repond: "We agree."
But the best comment of all time goes to reviewer 5, who states (with no apparent irony or embarassment):
"The paper is very statistically oriented and would do well with a more ideological approach."
RSS Feed